How to Cite
Abstract
The article provides an overview of recent publications devoted to phylogeny and taxonomy of the family Orchidaceae Juss., with a special reference to molecular phylogenetics. Modern methods of molecular taxonomy and phylogenetics are powerful tools that clarified many long-debated problems in phylogenetic systematics of orchids. In the recent phylogenetic systems (APG, APG II and others) Orchidaceae are placed in or near the extended order Asparagales, most probably at the base of the asparagalean clade. Recent age estimations for major angiosperm groups yielded rather unexpected results indicating that the orchid clade might be among the most ancient clades of extant monocots (molecular clock estimations at ca. 110 millions years). Ancestral orchids were probably terrestrial plants, and the epiphytic habit developed in the family many times and independently in different groups. The currently accepted topology of the phylogenetic tree of Orchidaceae indicates five major clades corresponding to subfamilies Apostasioideae, Vanilloideae, Cypripedioideae, Orchidoideae, Epidendroideae. Many traditionally accepted genera proved to be polyphyletic or paraphyletic, which will result in many taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. Special studies of morphological, biogeographical and other peculiarities of critical taxa are needed to explain the newly discovered molecular phylogenetic patterns in orchids.
References
Антонов А.С. Основы геносистематики высших растений. — М.: МАИК "Наука/Интерпериодика", 2000. — 135 с.
Доуэльд А.Б. Prosyllabus Tracheophytorum. Опыт системы сосудистых растений (Tracheophyta). — М.: ГЕОС, 2001. — lxxx + 110 c.
Ней М., Кумар С. Молекулярная эволюция и филогенетика / Пер. с англ. — К.: КВІЦ, 2004. — 418 с.
Собко В.Г. Орхідеї України. — К.: Наук. думка, 1989. — 192 с.
Тахтаджян А.Л. Система магнолиофитов. — Л.: Наука, 1987. — 439 с.
Черевченко Т.М., Кушнир Г.П. Орхидеи в культуре. — К.: Наук. думка, 1986. — 198 с.
Шипунов А.Б. Система цветковых растений: синтез традиционных и молекулярно-генетических подходов // Журн. общ. биол. — 2003. — 64, № 6. — С. 501—509.
Шнеер В.С. Краткий очерк способов получения, обработки и трактовки данных по последовательностям ДНК в систематике растений. I. Выделение и секвенирование ДНК; выравнивание последовательностей // Ботан. журн. — 2005. — 90, № 1. — С. 3—18.
Шнеер В.С. Краткий очерк способов получения, обработки и трактовки данных по последовательностям ДНК в систематике растений. II. Методы построения филогенетических деревьев и оценки их достоверности; о выборе таксонов и последовательностей ДНК для анализа // Ботан. журн. — 2005. — 90, № 3. — С. 304—332.
Albert V. Cladistic relationships of the slipper orchids (Cypripedoideae: Orchidaceae) from congruent morphological and molecular data // Lindleyana. — 1994. — Vol. 9. — P. 115—132.
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants // Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden. — 1998. — Vol. 85. — P. 531—553.
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group II (APG II). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II // Bot. J. Linnean Soc. — 2003. — Vol. 141. — P. 399—436.
Antonov A.S. Genosystematics: from E. Chargaff and A.N. Belozersky to the present // Molecular Biology (Transl. of: Molekulyarnaya Biologiya). — 2005. — Vol. 39. — P. 581—589.
Bateman R.M., Hollingsworth P.M., Preston J. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of Orchidinae and selected Habenariinae (Orchidaceae) // Bot. J. Linnean Soc. — 2003. — Vol. 142. — P. 1—40.
Bateman R.M., Pridgeon A.M., Chase M.W. Phylogenetics of subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidoideae, Orchidaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. 2. Infrageneric relationships and taxonomic revision to achieve monophyly of Orchis sensu stricto // Lindleyana. — 1997. — Vol. 12. — P. 113—141.
Benzing D.H. Vascular epiphytism: taxonomic participation and adaptive diversity // Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden. — 1987. — Vol. 74. — P. 182—204.
Van den Berg C., Higgins W.E., Dressler R.L. et al. A phylogenetic analysis of Laeliinae (Orchidaceae) based on sequence data from internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA // Lindleyana. — 2000. — Vol. 15. — P. 96—114.
Burns-Balogh P., Funk V.A. A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae // Smithsonian Contributions to Botany. — 1986. — Vol. 61. — P. 1—79.
Cameron K.M., Chase M.W. Phylogenetic relationships of Pogoniinae (Vanilloideae, Orchidaceae): an herbaceous example of the eastern North America-eastern Asia phytogeographic disjunction // J. Plant Res. — 1999. — Vol. 112. — P. 317—329.
Cameron K.M., Chase M.W., Whitten W.M. et al. A phylogenetic analysis of the Orchidaceae: evidence from rbcL nucleotide sequences // Amer. J. Bot. — 1999. — Vol. 86. — P. 208—224.
Chase M.W. Monocot relationships: an overview // Amer. J. Bot. — 2004. — Vol. 91. — P. 1645— 1655.
Chase M.W. Classification of Orchidaceae in the age of DNA data // Curtis's Bot. Mag. — 2005. — Vol. 22. — P. 2—7.
Chase M.W., Fay M.F., Savolainen V. Higherlevel classification in the angiosperms: new insights from the perspective of DNA sequence data // Taxon. — 2000. — Vol. 49. — P. 685—704.
Chase M.W., Soltis D.E., Olmstead R.G. et al. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL // Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden. — 1993. — Vol. 80. — P. 528—580.
Clements M.A., Jones D.L., Sharma I.K. et al. Phylogenetics of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA // Lindleyana. — 2002. — Vol. 17. — P. 135—171.
Cox A.V., Pridgeon A.M., Albert V.A., Chase M.W. Phylogenetics of the slipper orchids (Cypripedioideae, Orchidaceae): nuclear rDNA ITS sequences // Plant Syst. Evol. — 1997. — Vol. 208. — P. 197—223.
Crisp M.D., Cook L.G. Do early branching lineages signify ancestral traits? // Trends in Ecology and Evolution. — 2005. — Vol. 20. — P. 122—128.
Cronquist A. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. — 2nd edition. — Bronx, New York: New York Botanical Garden, 1988. — viii + 555 p.
Dahlgren R. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics // Nordic J. Bot. — 1983. — Vol. 3. — P. 119—149.
Dahlgren G. An updated angiosperm classification // Bot. J. Linnean Soc. — 1989. — Vol. 100. — P. 197—203.
Douzery E.J.P., Pridgeon A.M., Kores P. et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Diseae (Orchidaceae): a contribution from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences // Amer. J. Bot. — 1999. — Vol. 86. — P. 887—899.
Dressler R.L. Phylogeny and classification of the orchid family. — Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides Press, 1993. — 278 p.
Duvall M.R., Clegg M.T., Chase M.W. et al. Phylogenetic hypotheses for the monocotyledons constructed from rbcL sequences // Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden. — 1993. — Vol. 80. — P. 607—619.
Duvall M.R., Learn G.H., Eguiarte L.E., Clegg M.T. Phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences identifies Acorus calamus as the primal extant monocotyledon // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. — 1993. — Vol. 90. — P. 4641—4644.
Freudenstein J.V., van den Berg C., Goldman D.H. et al. An expanded plastid DNA phylogeny of Orchidaceae and analysis of jackknife branch support strategy // Amer. J. Bot. — 2004. — Vol. 91. — P. 149—157.
Freudenstein J.V., Rasmussen F.N. What does morphology tell us about orchid relationships? — A cladistic analysis // Amer. J. Bot. — 1999. — Vol. 86. — P. 225—248.
Freudenstein J.V., Harris E.M., Rasmussen F.N. The evolution of anther morphology in orchids — incumbent anthers, superposed pollinia, and the vandoid complex // Amer. J. Bot. — 2002. — Vol. 89. — P. 1747—1755.
Friis E.M., Pedersen K.R., Crane P.R. Araceae from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal: Evidence on the emergence of monocotyledons // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. — 2004. — Vol. 101. — P. 16565— 16570.
Gandolfo M.A., Nixon K.C., Crepet W.L. et al. Oldest known fossils of monocotyledons // Nature. — 1998. — Vol. 394. — P. 532—533.
Goldman D., Freudenstein J., Kores P. et al. Phylogenetics of Arethuseae (Orchidaceae) based on plastid matK and rbcL sequences // Syst. Bot. — 2001. — Vol. 26. — P. 670—695.
Goremykin V.V., Hirsch-Ernst K.I., W lfl S., Hellwig F.H. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm // Mol. Biol. Evol. — 2003. — Vol. 20. — P. 1499—1505.
Goremykin V.V., Hirsch-Ernst K.I., W lfl S., Hellwig F.H. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm // Mol. Biol. Evol. — 2004. — Vol. 21. — P. 1445—1454.
Goremykin V.V., Holland B., Hirsch-Ernst K.I., Hellwig F.H. Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications // Mol. Biol. Evol. — 2005. — Vol. 22. — P.1813—1822.
Hedr n M., Fay M.F., Chase M.W. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) reveal details of polyploid evolution in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) // Amer. J. Bot. — 2001. — Vol. 88. — P. 1868—1880.
Janssen T., Bremer K. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800+ rbcL sequences // Bot. J. Linnean Soc. — 2004. — Vol. 146. — P. 385—398.
Johnson S. D., Brown M. Transfer of pollinaria on birds' feet: a new pollination system in orchids // Plant Syst. Evol. — 2004. — Vol. 244. — P. 181—188.
Judd W.S., Campbell C.S., Kellogg E.A. et al. Plant systematics: a phylogenetic approach. — 2nd ed. — Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2002. — xvi + 576 p.
Kocyan A., Qiu Y.-L., Endress P. K., Conti E. A phylogenetic analysis of Apostasioideae (Orchidaceae) based on ITS, trnL-F and matK sequences // Plant Syst. Evol. — 2004. — Vol. 247. — P. 203—213.
Kores P.J., Cameron K.M., Molvray M., Chase M.W. The phylogenetic relationships of Orchidoideae and Spiranthoideae (Orchidaceae) as inferred from rbcL plastid sequences // Lindleyana. — 1997. — Vol. 12. — P. 1—11.
Kores P.J., Molvray M., Weston P.H. et al. A phylogenetic analysis of Diurideae (Orchidaceae) based on plastid DNA sequence data // Amer. J. Bot. — 2001. — Vol. 88. — P. 1903—1914.
Kristiansen K.A., Rasmussen F.N., Rasmussen H.N. Seedlings of Neuwiedia (Orchidaceae subfamily Apostasioideae) have typical orchidaceous mycotrophic protocorms // Amer. J. Bot. — 2001. — Vol. 88. — P. 956—959.
Magall n S.A., Sanderson M. J. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades // Evolution. — 2001. — Vol. 55. — P. 1762—1780.
Magall n S.A., Sanderson M. J. Angiosperm divergence times: the effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints // Evolution. — 2005. — Vol. 59. — P. 1653—1670.
McCormick M.K., Whigham D.F., O'Neill J. Mycorrhizal diversity in photosynthetic terrestrial orchids // New Phytol. — 2004. — Vol. 163. — P. 425—438.
Nazarov V.V., Gerlach G. The potential seed productivity of orchid flowers and peculiarities of their pollination systems // Lindleyana. — 1997. — Vol. 12. — P. 188—204.
Neyland R., Urbatsch L.E. A terrestrial origin for the Orchidaceae suggested by a phylogeny inferred from ndhF chloroplast gene sequences // Lindleyana. — 1995. — Vol. 10. — P. 244—251.
Neyland R., Urbatsch L.E. Phylogeny of subfamily Epidendroideae (Orchidaceae) inferred from ndhF chloroplast gene sequences // Amer. J. Bot. — 1996. — Vol. 83. — P. 1195—1206.
Pridgeon A.M., Bateman R.M., Cox A.V. et al. Phylogenetic of subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidoideae, Orchidaceae) based on nuclear ITS sequences. 1. Intergeneric relationships and polyphyly of Orchis sensu lato // Lindleyana. — 1997. — Vol. 12. — P. 89— 109.
Pridgeon A.M., Chase M.W. A phylogenetic reclassification of Pleurothallidinae (Orchidaceae) // Lindleyana. — 2001. — Vol. 16. — P. 235—271.
Pridgeon A.M., Solano R., Chase M.W. Phylogenetic relationships in Pleurothallidinae (Orchidaceae): combined evidence from nuclear and plastid DNA sequences // Amer. J. Bot. — 2001. — Vol. 88. — P. 2286—2308.
Reveal J.L. New supraordinal names and recognition of five classes in Magnoliophyta // Phytologia. — 1994. — Vol. 76. — P. 1—7.
Reveal J.L. Index Nominum Supragenericorum Plantarum Vascularium / International Association for Plant Taxonomy – Norton-Brown Herbarium at the University of Maryland. 1995 — onward. — http://www.life.umd.edu/emeritus/reveal/pbio/WWW/supragen.html
Reveal J.L., Pires J.C. Phylogeny and classification of the monocotyledons: an update // Flora of North America north of Mexico / Ed. by FNA Editorial Committee. — New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. — Vol. 26. Magnoliophyta: Liliidae: Liliales and Orchidales. — P. 3—36.
Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Monocot Checklist. 2004-onwards. Published on the Internet. — http://www.rbgkew.org.uk/data/monocots65.
Rudall P.J. Unique floral structures and iterative evolutionary themes in Asparagales: Insights from a morphological cladistic analysis // Bot. Review. — 2002. — Vol. 68. — P. 488—509.
Salazar G.A., Chase M.W., Soto Arenas M.A., Ingrouille M. Phylogenetics of Cranichideae with emphasis on Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Orchidoideae): evidence from plastid and nuclear DNA sequences // Amer. J. Bot. — 2003. — Vol. 90. — P. 777—795.
Sanderson M.J., Doyle J.A. Sources of error and confidence intervals in estimating the age of angiosperms from rbcL and 18S rDNA data // Amer. J. Bot. — 2001. — Vol. 88. — P. 1499—1516.
Savolainen V., Chase M.W. A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics // Trends in Genetics. — 2003. — Vol. 19. — P. 717—724.
Soltis D.E., Albert V.A., Savolainen V. et al. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and ending incongruence: a cautionary tale in phylogenetics // Trends in Plant Science. — 2004. — Vol. 9. — P. 477—483.
Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S. Amborella NOT a "basal angiosperm"? Not so fast // Amer. J. Bot. — 2004. — Vol. 91. — P. 997—1001.
Soltis D.E., Soltis P.S., Chase M.W. et al. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences // Bot. J. Linnaean Soc. — 2000. — Vol. 133. — P. 381—461.
Soltis P.S., Soltis D.E. The origin and diversification of angiosperms // Amer. J. Bot. — 2004. — Vol. 91. — P. 1614—1626.
Takhtajan A.L. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. — New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1997. — 663 p.
Tamura M.N., Yamashita J., Fuse Sh., Haraguchi M. Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences // J. Plant Res. — 2004. — Vol. 117. — P. 109—120.
Thorne R.F. Classification and geography of the flowering plants // Bot. Review. — 1992a. — Vol. 58. — P. 225—348.
Thorne R.F. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants // Aliso. — 1992b. — Vol. 13. — P. 365—389.
Whitten W.M., Williams N.H., Chase M.W. Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence // Amer. J. Bot. — 2000. — Vol. 87. — P. 1842—1856.
Wikström N., Savolainen V., Chase M.W. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree // Proc. Royal Soc. London, ser. B, Biol. Sciences. — 2001. — Vol. 268. — P. 2211—2220.
Wu Zheng-Yi, Lu An-Ming, Tang Yan-Cheng et al. Synopsis of a new "polyphyletic-polychronicpolytopic" system of the angiosperms // Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. — 2002. — Vol. 40. — P. 289— 322.
Yukawa T., Ohba H., Cameron K.M., Chase M.W. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of subtribe Dendrobiinae (Orchidaceae): Insights from a combined analysis based on rbcL sequences and restriction site variation // J. Plant Res. — 1996. — Vol. 109. — P. 169—176.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.